From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. District Attorneys

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 24, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00292-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. May. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00292-RCJ-GWF.

May 24, 2011


ORDER Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#1)


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#1), filed February 23, 2011.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action in federal district court. The Court may waive the filing fee where a prisoner-plaintiff complies with the strict application to proceed in forma pauperis filing requirements imposed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915; Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2000). These include the requirements that prisoner-plaintiff seeking to proceed in forma pauperis 1) submits a certified copy of his prisoner trust fund account statement for the previous six months, 2) pays the full amount of the filing fee and 3) that a prisoner seeking to file an action regarding prison conditions first exhaust available administrative remedies, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)-(b); Page, 201 F.3d at 1139.

The present application to proceed in forma pauperis is signed by two named plaintiffs, Allan Boyd and Nikci Boyd, who state that they are incarcerated at the Clark County Detention Center. Upon review and consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiffs' application to proceed in forma pauperis does not meet the specific requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Two people are not permitted to submit one application to proceed in forma pauperis because leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted on an individual basis.

The application contains additional failings as well. The financial disclosure fails to state the basis of their take home pay or wages, the amount of money that they have received from each source of income and what they expect to receive in the future. ( See #1). In addition, Plaintiffs state that they are incarcerated at Clark County Detention Center, but they have failed to submit a certified copy of their prisoner trust fund account statement for the previous six months as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Without this information, the application is incomplete and the Court is unable to grant Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The Court will grant Plaintiffs leave to reapply to proceed in forma pauperis by submitting new and separate applications, which shall include the specific information requested on the form and a certified prisoner trust fund statement as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#1) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall have until thirty (30) days from the date of this order to either pay the appropriate filing fee of $350.00, or submit completed applications, affidavits and certified prisoner trust fund statements. Plaintiffs' failure to comply with this order will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Boyd v. District Attorneys

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 24, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00292-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. May. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Boyd v. District Attorneys

Case Details

Full title:ALLAN BOYD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS and PUBLIC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00292-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. May. 24, 2011)