From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Apr 27, 2017
Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00264-BR-SPB (W.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00264-BR-SPB

04-27-2017

ALONZO R. BOYD, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL CLARK, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter and receiving no objection from Petitioner, HEREBY ORDERS:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;

3. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED;

4. This case is CLOSED; and

5. The clerk shall send copies of this Order to the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: April 27, 2017

/s/_________

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Boyd v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Apr 27, 2017
Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00264-BR-SPB (W.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Boyd v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO R. BOYD, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL CLARK, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE

Date published: Apr 27, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00264-BR-SPB (W.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2017)