From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. City of Cumberland

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Aug 25, 2009
09-cv-268-slc (W.D. Wis. Aug. 25, 2009)

Opinion

09-cv-268-slc.

August 25, 2009


ORDER


The motion of defendants City of Cumberland, Officer John Smith and Officer Stephen Zimmer to sever the plaintiffs and defendants under Fed.R.Civ.P. 20 is GRANTED. The claims of plaintiffs Kristopher W. Boyd and Jeffrey L. Retzlaff arise out of two unrelated incidents, one involving an arrest of plaintiff Retzlaff by defendant Smith in January 2007 and the second involving an arrest of plaintiff Boyd by defendants Smith and Zimmer in March of the same year. Rule 20 allows joinder of plaintiffs if "they assert any right to relief joint, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." Plaintiffs do not meet this criterion. They assert that there are issues of fact in common, such as the indicia of probable cause for the arrest of persons accused of driving while intoxicated and the training that defendant City of Cumberland gives its officers, but they have no allegations to support their assertion at this time and even if they did, there is little reason to believe that potential similarities in two arrests would support a finding of a pattern or practice of illegal police work.


Summaries of

Boyd v. City of Cumberland

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Aug 25, 2009
09-cv-268-slc (W.D. Wis. Aug. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Boyd v. City of Cumberland

Case Details

Full title:KRISTOPHER W. BOYD, and JEFFREY L. RETZLAFF, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Aug 25, 2009

Citations

09-cv-268-slc (W.D. Wis. Aug. 25, 2009)