From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyce v. Seas Shipping Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 19, 1945
152 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1945)

Opinion

No. 102.

December 19, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Libel by Daniel H. Boyce against the Seas Shipping Company to recover for injuries sustained by libelant, a steward, while on board one of respondent's ships. From a decree in the admiralty of the District Court dismissing the libel, libelant appeals.

Affirmed.

Silas B. Axtell, of New York City (Lucien V. Axtell, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Paul L. Murphy and Frank V. Barns, both of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


The libellant testified that he slipped upon the floor of the pantry of the ship on which he was serving as a steward, while carrying some glasses to the officers' dining room; the floor of the pantry being at the time "sloppy and full of grease, and the ship was rolling." We may assume for argument that there are occasions when a ship may be liable for an oily or greasy pantry floor; but, if so, this was not shown to have been one. It is impossible to say from the libellant's testimony how long the condition had existed of which he complained. The judge's finding of fact was not "clearly erroneous" that "there was no credible evidence in this case that either the galley or alley-way was wet or greasy, and that the defendant had actual or imputed notice thereof."

Decree affirmed.


Summaries of

Boyce v. Seas Shipping Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 19, 1945
152 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1945)
Case details for

Boyce v. Seas Shipping Co.

Case Details

Full title:BOYCE v. SEAS SHIPPING CO

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 1945

Citations

152 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1945)

Citing Cases

Poignant v. United States

The trial court found that the defendant had no notice, actual or constructive, of the presence of the apple…

McDonald v. Dingwall Shipping Company

But while the benefits of the doctrine may be availed of by longshoremen, the facts of the case do not bring…