From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyce v. Schriro

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 21, 2005
No. CV 04-00166-PHX-ROS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Nov. 21, 2005)

Opinion

No. CV 04-00166-PHX-ROS (ECV).

November 21, 2005


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #106)) of the court's order (Doc. #104) denying his motion to stay this case. In his one-sentence motion, Plaintiff has not presented newly discovered evidence, shown clear error or cited a change in the law. See School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) ("Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law."). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration will be denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #106) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Boyce v. Schriro

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 21, 2005
No. CV 04-00166-PHX-ROS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Nov. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Boyce v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:Antonneo R. Boyce, Plaintiff, v. Dora Schriro, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

No. CV 04-00166-PHX-ROS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Nov. 21, 2005)