From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyce v. Schriro

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 10, 2006
No. CV 05-3015-PHX-ROS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Jul. 10, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 05-3015-PHX-ROS (ECV).

July 10, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a Motion to Stay (Doc. #35) in which he requests a stay of the case pending the resolution of a writ of mandamus that he filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals involving a discovery issue. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that his writ of mandamus has a strong likelihood of success. Accordingly, a stay is not warranted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Petitioner's Motion to Stay (Doc. #35) is denied.


Summaries of

Boyce v. Schriro

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 10, 2006
No. CV 05-3015-PHX-ROS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Jul. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Boyce v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:Antonneo R. Boyce, Petitioner, v. Dora Schriro, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jul 10, 2006

Citations

No. CV 05-3015-PHX-ROS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Jul. 10, 2006)