Boyce v. Schriro

Full title: Antonneo R. Boyce, Petitioner, v. Dora Schriro, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Apr 17, 2006

No. CV 05-3015-PHX-ROS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Apr. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 05-3015-PHX-ROS (ECV).

April 17, 2006

ORDER

EDWARD VOSS, Magistrate Judge

Petitioner has filed a Motion to Stay (Doc. #30) in which he requests a stay of the time to file a reply in support of his habeas petition until Judge Silver rules on his Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #25) regarding discovery. The court will not stay the time to file a reply indefinitely while Petitioner seeks reconsideration of a prior order. In the event that the motion for reconsideration is granted, Petitioner may seek leave to file a supplemental reply. In the interim, however, a stay is not warranted. Petitioner's motion will therefore be denied. The court, however, will grant Petitioner an additional 30 days to file a reply in support of his petition.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Petitioner's Motion to Stay (Doc. #30) is denied; and

That Petitioner's reply in support of his petition must be filed on or before May 14, 2006.