From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boxabl Inc. v. Tassev

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 16, 2023
2:23-cv-0760-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0760-CDS-VCF

08-16-2023

Boxabl, Inc., Plaintiff(s), v. Yanni Tassev a/k/a Iani Tassev, Defendant(s).


ORDER

CAMFERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for extension of time to serve amended complaint and emergency motion. (ECF No. 36).

Plaintiff is requesting up to and including September 11, 2023 to perfect service on Yanni Tassev a/k/a Iani Tassev.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court--on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff--must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” “The 90-day time limit imposed by Rule 4(m) expires 90 days after the first complaint in which the defendant is named...” is filed. Bolden v. City of Topeka, 441 F.3d 1129, 1148 (10th Cir. 2006)(emphasis added). The 90-day time limit for service does not restart each time a plaintiff files a new amended complaint. Id. The district court may extend time for service of process retroactively after the 90-day service period has expired. See Mann v. American Airlines, 324 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2003).

The complaint was filed on April 27, 2023. The deadline to effectuate service of process was July 26, 2023. Id; Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Plaintiff states that the process server has made numerous attempts to serve defendant at his last known addresses, but service was unsuccessful. Plaintiff is requesting an extension up to and including September 11, 2023 to perfect service on defendant.

The time to effectuate service upon defendant expired on July 26, 2023, and plaintiff must make a showing of good cause or excusable neglect in order for the court to extend this deadline for an appropriate period. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); Lemoge, 587 F.3d at 1198; Mann, 324 F.3d at 1090 (the court may extend the deadline for service of process retroactively).

Here, the court finds that good cause warrants extending the service of process deadline.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for extension of time to serve amended complaint and emergency motion (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED. The time to perfect service is extended to and including September 11, 2023.


Summaries of

Boxabl Inc. v. Tassev

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 16, 2023
2:23-cv-0760-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Boxabl Inc. v. Tassev

Case Details

Full title:Boxabl, Inc., Plaintiff(s), v. Yanni Tassev a/k/a Iani Tassev…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 16, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0760-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2023)