From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowyer v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Sep 4, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00115 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 4, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00115

09-04-2019

HEATHER VERONICA BOWYER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 4) entered on February 15, 2019, this action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 12, 2019, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 19) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's request for judgment on the pleadings (Document 17), grant the Defendant's request to affirm the final decision of the Commissioner (Document 18), affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by August 29, 2019.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's request for judgment on the pleadings (Document 17) be DENIED, the Defendant's request to affirm the final decision of the Commissioner (Document 18) be GRANTED, the final decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED, and this action be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: September 4, 2019

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Bowyer v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Sep 4, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00115 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Bowyer v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER VERONICA BOWYER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Sep 4, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00115 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 4, 2019)