Bowser v. Sang N. Nguyen (In re Marriage of Bowser)

7 Citing cases

  1. In re Bellamy

    1 CA-CV 23-0323 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2024)

    ¶9 In a dissolution, the "court must divide community property equitably and assign each spouse his or her sole and separate property." Bowser v. Nguyen, 249 Ariz. 454, 456, ¶ 8 (App. 2020). We review the superior court's characterization of property de novo.

  2. Koizumi v. Morogiello

    1 CA-CV 21-0683 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. Sep. 15, 2022)

    See Dumes v. Harold Laz Advert. Co., 2 Ariz. App. 387, 388 (1965) ("The uncontradicted testimony of an interested party may be rejected, but where the testimony of an interested party is supported by 'disinterested corroboration,' a rejection of that evidence amounts to arbitrary action by the court."). When viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the court's decree, Bowser v. Nguyen, 249 Ariz. 454, 456 ¶ 8 (App. 2020), the finding that the Transferred Stocks constitute Husband's inheritance was not clearly erroneous. Consequently, the court did not err in finding the Transferred Stocks to be Husband's separate property.

  3. Barr v. Barr

    1 CA-CV 20-0701 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2022)

    See 41 C.J.S. Husband and Wife § 289; Bowser v. Nguyen, 249 Ariz. 454, 455, 457, ¶¶ 2, 12 (App. 2020). ¶15 Wife contends that Husband's severance benefits were community property under Bowser v. Nguyen.

  4. In re Marriage of Brucker

    2 CA-CV 2022-0137-FC (Ariz. Ct. App. Mar. 22, 2024)

    ¶2 "We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the family court's decree." Bowser v. Nguyen, 249 Ariz. 454, ¶ 8 (App. 2020). The parties were married in July 2000.

  5. Traylor v. State ex rel. Dep't of Econ. Sec.

    1 CA-CV 23-0166 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2023)

    ¶2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court's decree. Bowser v. Nguyen, 249 Ariz. 454, 456 ¶ 8 (App. 2020). Mother and Father were married in 2013 and separated in 2018.

  6. In re Marriage of Goodwin

    1 CA-CV 22-0160 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. May. 30, 2023)

    ¶2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court's decree. Bowser v. Nguyen, 249 Ariz. 454, 456 ¶ 8 (App. 2020). Wife and Husband were married in 2003 and have two minor children, R.G. and C.G.

  7. Chauncey v. Chauncey

    No. 1 CA-CV 19-0696 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2021)   Cited 1 times

    We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the family court's decree. See Bell-Kilbourn v. Bell-Kilbourn, 216 Ariz. 521, 522, ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2007); Bowser v. Nguyen, 249 Ariz. 454, 456, ¶ 8 (App. 2020); Thomas v. Thomas, 142 Ariz. 386, 392 (App. 1984). II. Transmutation and Husband's Burden of Proof