From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowman v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 1, 2017
Case No. 2D16-5303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2D16-5303

09-01-2017

BRITTANY BOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Brittany Bowman, pro se.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge. Brittany Bowman, pro se. LaROSE, Chief Judge.

Affirmed without prejudice to whatever right the appellant may have to file a timely and facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bowman v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 1, 2017
Case No. 2D16-5303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2017)
Case details for

Bowman v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRITTANY BOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 1, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2D16-5303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2017)