From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowman v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. C.V. S-07-2164 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)

Opinion

No. C.V. S-07-2164 FCD KJM P.

October 22, 2008


ORDER


On September 5, 2008, the court vacated the hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss and directed plaintiff to file his opposition. On October 7, 2008, the court granted plaintiff's request for an extension of time in which to file the opposition. On the same day, plaintiff filed something which he titled "Objections To Findings and Recommendations" even though no findings and recommendations have been issued on the motion to dismiss. In this document, plaintiff does address the merits of the pending motion to dismiss; the court will deem it to be his opposition to the motion to dismiss.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. The document filed on October 7, entitled "Objections" (docket no. 38) will be deemed an opposition to the motion to dismiss unless plaintiff notifies the court within fifteen days that he wishes to file a further opposition;

2. If plaintiff has not so notified the court at the expiration of this fifteen day period, defendants' reply, if any, is due thirty days thereafter; and

3. The defendants are directed to reserve a copy of their motion and the supporting points and authorities and exhibits on plaintiff at his correct address within fifteen days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Bowman v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. C.V. S-07-2164 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Bowman v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:GARY STEVEN BOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 22, 2008

Citations

No. C.V. S-07-2164 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)