Opinion
2:23-cv-00193-GMN-EJY
02-22-2023
DARRYL G. BOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. NEVADA PAROLE BOARD COMMISSIONERS, Defendant.
ORDER
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 3), of United States Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Darryl G. Bowman's (“Plaintiff's”) Complaint, (ECF No. 1-1), for failure to state a claim, and as a result, deny Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 1).
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's R&R where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See Min. Order, ECF No. 3) (setting a February 21, 2023, deadline for objections).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 3), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint, (ECF No. 1-1), is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 1), is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to close the case.