Opinion
No. 74909
07-20-2018
TYRONE BOWMAN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and CONNIE S. BISBEE; THE STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS; THE STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE; AND NDOC, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order directing the Board of Parole Commissioners "to reverse and vacate its stipulations and orders and/or actions that are illegally binding on [Tyrone Bowman] to abide by stipulations of a sex offender's statute." Bowman has not provided this court with any documentation supporting his petition, see NRAP 21(a)(4), nor has he explained why he has not sought relief in the district court, see NRS 34.170 (providing mandamus relief is appropriate where there is no plain, speedy, or adequate remedy available in the ordinary course of law). Therefore, we conclude Bowman has not demonstrated this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted at this time. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Silver
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Tyrone Bowman
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk