From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowman v. Crosby

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 22, 2005
Case No.: 3:03cv568/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2005)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:03cv568/RV/EMT.

November 22, 2005


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated October 21, 2005. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary and Permanent Injunction (Doc. 45) is DENIED as moot.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bowman v. Crosby

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 22, 2005
Case No.: 3:03cv568/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2005)
Case details for

Bowman v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN BOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES CROSBY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Nov 22, 2005

Citations

Case No.: 3:03cv568/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2005)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Allen

The Court is not authorized to issue injunctive relief against the Macon State Prison officials, as it lacks…

Tarantino v. Citrus Cnty. Gov't

District courts generally lack subject matter jurisdiction to issue injunctive relief against non-parties.…