From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowman v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2014
CASE NO. 1:09 CV 248 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2014)

Summary

In Bowman v. Colvin, No. 1:09-cv-248, 2014 WL 1304914 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2014), another branch of this court approved a § 406(b) award that translated into $720 per hour (which was about 2.6 times counsel's average hourly rate).

Summary of this case from Morabito v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09 CV 248

03-27-2014

Douglas A. Bowman, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN


Memorandum of Opinion and Order

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II (Doc. 27) recommending that the Court approve counsel's request for attorney's fees in the amount of $11,582.50, with $2,000.00 to be remitted back to plaintiff. No objections have been filed. For the reasons that follow, the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and the fee request is approved.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When objections are made to a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews the case de novo. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides in pertinent part:

The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made in accordance with this rule. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.

As stated in the Advisory Committee Notes, "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." In Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985), the Court held, "It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate judge's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings."

DECISION

This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court hereby approves attorney's fees in the amount of $11,582.50 with $2,000.00 to be remitted to plaintiff. The Report and Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bowman v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2014
CASE NO. 1:09 CV 248 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2014)

In Bowman v. Colvin, No. 1:09-cv-248, 2014 WL 1304914 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2014), another branch of this court approved a § 406(b) award that translated into $720 per hour (which was about 2.6 times counsel's average hourly rate).

Summary of this case from Morabito v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Bowman v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:Douglas A. Bowman, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09 CV 248 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2014)

Citing Cases

Tarr v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Id. Rather, Section 406(b) provides that whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant who was…

Woodberry v. Commissioiner of Soc. Sec.

As plaintiff's counsel points out, the Court has already awarded attorney fees in this case under the EAJA in…