From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowling v. Prudential Insurance Company

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 16, 2010
No. C 09-1581 MHP (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 09-1581 MHP.

April 16, 2010


ORDER (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)


The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.


Summaries of

Bowling v. Prudential Insurance Company

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 16, 2010
No. C 09-1581 MHP (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Bowling v. Prudential Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY L. BOWLING, Plaintiff(s), v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 16, 2010

Citations

No. C 09-1581 MHP (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2010)