From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowling v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
May 11, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-cv-0504 (W.D. La. May. 11, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-cv-0504

05-11-2020

CANDYCE BOWLING v. MARCUS BROWN, ET AL


JUDGE ELIZABETH E. FOOTE

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Candyce Bowling ("Plaintiff") filed this civil action against Marcus Brown, Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. ("Southern"), and IQS Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. ("IQS") for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Mr. Brown and Southern removed the case on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, which puts the burden on them to set forth specific facts that show complete diversity of citizenship of the parties and an amount in controversy over $75,000. The allegations in the notice of removal are sufficient with one exception.

The notice of removal does not set forth any allegations with regard to the citizenship of IQS, which had not yet been served at the time of removal. Diversity in a removal case is determined from the fact of citizenship of the parties named and not from the fact of service. "A non-resident defendant cannot remove an action if the citizenship of any co-defendant, joined by the plaintiff in good faith, destroys complete diversity, regardless of service or non-service upon the co-defendant." New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deshotel, 142 F.3d 873, 883 (5th Cir. 1998). To establish that diversity jurisdiction exists, the removing defendants must file an amended notice of removal that specifically alleges IQS' type of entity, whether a corporation, LLC, or other form of unincorporated entity, and sets forth its citizenship in accordance with the rules outlined in such cases as Shands v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2020 WL 402287 (W.D. La. 2020) and Rodidaco, Inc. v. Chesapeake Energy Louisiana Corp. 2018 WL 3551525 (W.D. La. 2018).

Because the removing defendants may not have access to IQS' citizenship information at this stage of the litigation, they will be allowed until 10 days after IQS has made an appearance in the case to file their amended notice of removal. Alternatively, IQS may include the information in its answer.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 11th day of May, 2020.

/s/ _________

Mark L. Hornsby

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Bowling v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
May 11, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-cv-0504 (W.D. La. May. 11, 2020)
Case details for

Bowling v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:CANDYCE BOWLING v. MARCUS BROWN, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: May 11, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-cv-0504 (W.D. La. May. 11, 2020)