From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowles v. Ray

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 1945
146 F.2d 652 (9th Cir. 1945)

Opinion

No. 10699.

January 5, 1945. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Peirson M. Hall, Judge.

Thomas I. Emerson, Deputy Adm'r for Enforcement, Fleming James, Jr., Director, Litigation Division, David London, Chief, Appellate Branch, and Albert Dreyer, Atty., OPA, all of Washington, D.C., W. Dunlap Cannon, Jr., Regional Litigation Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., and H. Eugene Breitenbach, District Enforcement Atty., OPA, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Pearlson Singer and Morris Lavine, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


On the authority of Chester Bowles, Administrator, v. Glick Brothers Lumber Co., et al., 9 Cir., 146 F.2d 566, the judgment of dismissal is reversed.


Summaries of

Bowles v. Ray

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 1945
146 F.2d 652 (9th Cir. 1945)
Case details for

Bowles v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:Chester BOWLES, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, Appellant…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 26, 1945

Citations

146 F.2d 652 (9th Cir. 1945)