From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowlds v. Bridges

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Apr 7, 2023
No. CIV-23-210-R (W.D. Okla. Apr. 7, 2023)

Opinion

CIV-23-210-R

04-07-2023

CHARLES R. BOWLDS, Petitioner, v. CARRIE BRIDGES, Respondent.


ORDER

DAVID L. RUSSELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking a writ of habeas corpus and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. Nos. 1 and 2). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for preliminary review. On March 7, 2023, Judge Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation wherein he recommended that Petitioner be required to pay the full filing fee, and further, that if Petitioner did not tender the fee prior to March 27, 2023, that the action be dismissed without prejudice. The record reflects that Petitioner has not objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed therein nor sought an extension of time in which to object. Additionally, he has not tendered payment of the $5.00 filing fee. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, denies Petitioner's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bowlds v. Bridges

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Apr 7, 2023
No. CIV-23-210-R (W.D. Okla. Apr. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Bowlds v. Bridges

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES R. BOWLDS, Petitioner, v. CARRIE BRIDGES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 7, 2023

Citations

No. CIV-23-210-R (W.D. Okla. Apr. 7, 2023)