From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowie v. Woodbine Estates, LLC

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-001064 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-001064 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-393

11-12-2014

Patrick Bowie, Respondent, v. Woodbine Estates, LLC, Appellant.

Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., of Law Firm of Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant. Robert Jamison Tinsley, Jr., of Greenwood, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Abbeville County
Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., of Law Firm of Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant. Robert Jamison Tinsley, Jr., of Greenwood, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. M & T Enters. of Mt. Pleasant, 379 S.C. 645, 658, 667 S.E.2d 7, 14 (Ct. App. 2008) ("It is well settled that an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review."); I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C. 406, 422, 526 S.E.2d 716, 724 (2000) ("The losing party must first try to convince the [trial] court it . . . has ruled wrongly and then, if that effort fails, convince the appellate court that the [trial] court erred. This principle underlies the long-established preservation requirement that the losing party generally must both present his issues and arguments to the [trial] court and obtain a ruling before an appellate court will review those issues and arguments."). AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bowie v. Woodbine Estates, LLC

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-001064 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Bowie v. Woodbine Estates, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Bowie, Respondent, v. Woodbine Estates, LLC, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 12, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-001064 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2014)