From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowers v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 2009
59 A.D.3d 793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 504903.

February 11, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Keith Bowers, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ.


Following an altercation with another inmate, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violent conduct, assault, fighting and refusing a direct order. At the tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty with explanation to each of the charges and asserted a justification defense. Ultimately, petitioner was found guilty and an administrative penalty was imposed. Although the penalty subsequently was modified, petitioner's administrative appeal otherwise proved unsuccessful, prompting him to commence this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination.

We confirm. Given petitioner's plea and the testimony of the correction officers who responded to quell the violent conduct, we conclude that the determination of guilt was supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Ramirez v Goord, 32 AD3d 601; Matter of Calhoun v Goord, 20 AD3d 628, 628-629). Petitioner's contrary claim that he acted only in self-defense and did not willingly reengage in the fighting, as the correction officers testified, presented a question of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Carter v Goord, 8 AD3d 771, 772). Petitioner's remaining claims, including his claim of hearing officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Bowers v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 2009
59 A.D.3d 793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Bowers v. Venettozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KEITH BOWERS, Petitioner, v. D. VENETTOZZI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 11, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1053
873 N.Y.S.2d 755

Citing Cases

In re Lawrence Bartley

First, with regard to the prison disciplinary proceeding, petitioner claims that his employee assistant was…

In re James

After exhausting his administrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding…