From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowens v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 9:11-cv-784 (GLS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013)

Summary

holding that an inmate's allegation of a 500-day confinement in Ad Seg was sufficient to state a liberty interest

Summary of this case from Proctor v. Leclaire

Opinion

Civil Action No. 9:11-cv-784 (GLS/ATB)

01-08-2013

JERRY BOWENS Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH T. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: JERRY BOWENS 09-A-5598 Plaintiff, pro se Clinton Correctional Facility FOR THE DEFENDANTS: HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York OF COUNSEL: RICHARD LOMBARDO, ESQ.


APPEARANCES:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:

JERRY BOWENS
09-A-5598
Plaintiff, pro se
Clinton Correctional Facility

FOR THE DEFENDANTS:

HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the
State of New York
OF COUNSEL: RICHARD LOMBARDO, ESQ. GARY L. SHARPE,
CHIEF JUDGE

ORDER

The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed December 7, 2012. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter filed December 7, 2012 is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein; and it is further

ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) is GRANTED IN PART, and the amended complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY AS AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISCHER, PRACK AND LECLAIRE; and it is further

ORDERED, that defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED IN PART, and plaintiff's amended complaint may proceed only as to plaintiff's PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS and RELIGION CLAIMS as against defendant SMITH; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk provide a copy of this order upon the parties in accordance with the court's local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2013

Albany, New York

_________________

Gary L. Sharpe

Chief Judge

U.S. District Court


Summaries of

Bowens v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 9:11-cv-784 (GLS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013)

holding that an inmate's allegation of a 500-day confinement in Ad Seg was sufficient to state a liberty interest

Summary of this case from Proctor v. Leclaire

applying the Colon five forms of evidence to show personal involvement of supervisory defendants

Summary of this case from Tolliver v. Skinner
Case details for

Bowens v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JERRY BOWENS Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH T. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 9:11-cv-784 (GLS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Martuscello

The Court finds this legal principle equally applicable under the current facts of this case. See also Bowens…

Woods v. Martuscello

Generally speaking, confining an inmate in the SHU, without more, and notwithstanding the restrictions that…