From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowen v. Bureau of Prison of United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Mar 2, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-00062-RWS-CMC (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-00062-RWS-CMC

03-02-2021

JOEL BOWEN, Plaintiff, v. THE BUREAU OF PRISON OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Joel Bowen, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil action complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights and seeking class certification. The case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Bowen was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of $45.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §1915(b). He received a copy of this order on December 10, 2020, but has not complied or has he responded in any way. See Docket No. 28. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending the lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Docket No. 29. By separate Report, the Magistrate Judge also recommended denial of Bowen's motion for class certification (Docket No. 6). Docket No. 27.

Bowen received copies of both of these Reports on or before January 25, 2021, but has filed no objections. See Docket Nos. 28, 30. Accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the Reports of the Magistrate Judge and has determined that the Reports are correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law."). It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Reports of the Magistrate Judge (Docket Nos. 27, 29) are ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. Bowen's motion for class certification (Docket No. 6) is therefore DENIED. Further, the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or obey an order of the Court.

SIGNED this 2nd day of March, 2021.

/s/_________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bowen v. Bureau of Prison of United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Mar 2, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-00062-RWS-CMC (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Bowen v. Bureau of Prison of United States

Case Details

Full title:JOEL BOWEN, Plaintiff, v. THE BUREAU OF PRISON OF THE UNITED STATES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 2, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-00062-RWS-CMC (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2021)