From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02370 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:10-cv-02370 AWI JLT Doc. 16

09-06-2011

PATSY BOWEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Parties have stipulated by counsel to extend the period of time for Defendant to a responsive brief. (Doc. 16). Here, Defendant's counsel seeks an extension of thirty days "due to a workload reallocation." (Doc. 16 at 1). The Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 7-1 at 4). Accordingly, Defendant shall file a responsive brief on or before October 12, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bowen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02370 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Bowen v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PATSY BOWEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:10-cv-02370 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)