Bowen v. Astrue

Full title: PATSY BOWEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Case No.: 1:10-cv-02370 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:10-cv-02370 AWI JLT.

September 7, 2011

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 16)

JENNIFER THURSTON, Magistrate Judge

Parties have stipulated by counsel to extend the period of time for Defendant to a responsive brief. (Doc. 16). Here, Defendant's counsel seeks an extension of thirty days "due to a workload reallocation." (Doc. 16 at 1). The Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 7-1 at 4). Accordingly, Defendant shall file a responsive brief on or before October 12, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 6, 2011