From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowell v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2018
Case No. CV 17-09313 TJH (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-09313 TJH (MAA)

09-26-2018

JAMES BOWELL, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. Petitioner's objections are overruled.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; (2) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition is granted in part on the ground of abstention pursuant to the Younger doctrine; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: September 26, 2018

/s/_________

TERRY J. HATTER, JR.

UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bowell v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2018
Case No. CV 17-09313 TJH (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Bowell v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BOWELL, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 17-09313 TJH (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2018)