From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowell v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2013
2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2013)

Opinion


JAMES E. BOWELL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) United States District Court, E.D. California. September 3, 2013

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 4, 2012, this court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. Judgment was entered the same day. On August 1, 7, and 12, 2013, plaintiff filed three motions styled as motions for injunctive relief. Those motions filed by plaintiff are predicated on alleged events unrelated to the issues raised in this action and must be made, if at all, by plaintiff in a new civil action.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff's August 1, 7, and 12, 2013 motions (ECF Nos. 83, 84, and 85) are denied without prejudice;

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a form civil rights complaint and accompanying instructions; and

         3. Plaintiff is advised that no orders will issue in response to future filings in this closed case.


Summaries of

Bowell v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2013
2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Bowell v. California Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. BOWELL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 3, 2013

Citations

2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2013)