From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowell v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC).

February 15, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On January 31, 2011, plaintiff filed a document styled as an opposition to defendants' answer. Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows:

There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a third-party answer.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a) (emphasis added). The court has not ordered plaintiff to reply to defendants' answer and declines to make such an order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's opposition to defendants' answer shall be disregarded.

DATED: February 15, 2011.


Summaries of

Bowell v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Bowell v. California Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. BOWELL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 15, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)