From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowden v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 14, 2016
NO. PD-0394-16 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 14, 2016)

Opinion

NO. PD-0394-16

09-14-2016

JOE LEE BOWDEN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS


ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. HERVEY, J., not participating. OPINION

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced life imprisonment. In his third issue on appeal, Appellant raised a constitutional challenge to the portion of court costs which went to emergency radio infrastructure. The court of appeals held that this issue was waived because Appellant did not object to the court cost at trial. Bowden v. State, No. 14-14-00955-CR (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.], March 22, 2016). Appellant petitioned this Court for discretionary review.

When the Court of Appeals issued its opinion in this case, it did so without the benefit of this Court's recent opinion in Ex parte London, ___ S.W.3d ___; No. PD-0480-15 (Tex. Crim App. May 18, 2016). Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for that court to consider the effect of London, if any, on its reasoning and analysis in this case. Delivered: September 14, 2016
Do not publish


Summaries of

Bowden v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 14, 2016
NO. PD-0394-16 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Bowden v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOE LEE BOWDEN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 14, 2016

Citations

NO. PD-0394-16 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 14, 2016)

Citing Cases

Bowden v. State

When we decided this case on original submission, we held that appellant, by not objecting in the trial…

Bowden v. State

When we decided this case on original submission, we held that appellant, by not objecting in the trial…