From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowden v. Parnell Menard Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 2, 1996
918 S.W.2d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 67757.

April 2, 1996.

APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FRANKLIN COUNTY, HON. JOHN C. BRACKMANN, JUDGE.

R. Andrew Beeny, Clayton, for appellants.

Daniel J. Briegel, Briegel, Baylard, P.C., Union, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.


ORDER


Appellants, Kevin Bowden, Patricia Bowden, and Ted Schmitz ("homeowners"), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County finding for respondent, Parnell Menard Corporation ("seller-builder"), on homeowners' claims of breach of implied warranties of fitness for purpose. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16 (b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been provided solely for the use of the parties involved.


Summaries of

Bowden v. Parnell Menard Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 2, 1996
918 S.W.2d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Bowden v. Parnell Menard Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN BOWDEN, PATRICIA BOWDEN, AND TED SCHMITZ, PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS, v…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Apr 2, 1996

Citations

918 S.W.2d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)