From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowden v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 27, 2022
No. 14446-20 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 27, 2022)

Opinion

14446-20

04-27-2022

RICHARDEEN BOWDEN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

The Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and we may exercise that jurisdiction only to the extent authorized by Congress. Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985). This Court's jurisdiction to redetermine a deficiency depends on the issuance of a valid notice of deficiency and a timely filed petition. Rule 13(a), (c), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure; Monge v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 22, 27 (1989); Normac, Inc. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 142, 147 (1988). Despite the fact that petitioner's late filing is due to an oversight, the Court has no authority to extend that statutory period. Axe v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 256, 259 (1972). The petition in this case was not timely filed, and we are obliged to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction.

Upon due consideration, it is therefore

ORDERED that respondent's motion to dismiss is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Bowden v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 27, 2022
No. 14446-20 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Bowden v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:RICHARDEEN BOWDEN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Apr 27, 2022

Citations

No. 14446-20 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 27, 2022)