From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowcut v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2022
2:21-cv-00736 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00736 DB P

11-18-2022

DONALD RAY BOWCUT, Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 29.) As defendants have filed answer in this action, any voluntary dismissal of this action must either be by consent of the parties or by court order. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants notify this court, within seven days, whether they have any objection to the dismissal of this action. Should defendants fail to respond, plaintiff's request will be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2).


Summaries of

Bowcut v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2022
2:21-cv-00736 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Bowcut v. Daram

Case Details

Full title:DONALD RAY BOWCUT, Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 18, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00736 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2022)