From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BOW v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 16, 1932
55 S.W.2d 341 (Ky. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

Decided December 16, 1932.

Appeal from Cumberland Circuit Court.

W.E. MILLER and S.A. CARY for appellants.

C.R. HICKS, and BAILEY P. WOOTTON, Attorney General, and GARDNER K. BYERS, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Affirming.

Property belonging to Ellen Bow and eight others was taken for the construction of a highway, and Ellen Bow alone had appealed.

The statement of appeal filed reads, "Ellen Bow et al., Appellants," but such expressions as "et al.," "etc.," "and others," and "c.," are absolutely meaningless in a statement filed under section 739 of the Code of Civil Practice.

No exceptions had been filed to the report of the commissioners; therefore there was no issue made in the trial court and nothing to complain of here.

This concludes no one but Ellen Bow, as she is the only appellant.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

BOW v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 16, 1932
55 S.W.2d 341 (Ky. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

BOW v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION

Case Details

Full title:Bow et al. v. State Highway Commission

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Dec 16, 1932

Citations

55 S.W.2d 341 (Ky. Ct. App. 1932)
55 S.W.2d 341