From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bow v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP

07-15-2021

KATHY BOW, ROBERT PAPP, AND SUSAIN WEISINGER, Plaintiffs, v. CEBRIDGE TELECOM CA, LLC D/B/A SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS; ALTICE USA, INC.; CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; CEBRIDGE ACQUISITION, L.P.; CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

Kevin Osborne, State Bar No. 261367 Julie Erickson, State Bar No. 293111 Elizabeth Kramer, State Bar No. 293129 Erickson Kramer Osborne LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs


Kevin Osborne, State Bar No. 261367 Julie Erickson, State Bar No. 293111 Elizabeth Kramer, State Bar No. 293129 Erickson Kramer Osborne LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RULE 26 DEADLINES [L.R. 144; FED. R. CIV. P. 6]

Troy L Nunley, United States District Judge.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES, 1. The parties' deadline to file their Rule 26(f) report shall be extended to 30 days after the date on which the Court issues its ruling on the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation;

2. The parties' deadline to exchange Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures shall be extended to 30 days after the date on which the Court issues its ruling on the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bow v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Bow v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC

Case Details

Full title:KATHY BOW, ROBERT PAPP, AND SUSAIN WEISINGER, Plaintiffs, v. CEBRIDGE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)