From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bow v. Cebridge Telecom Ca, LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 21, 2021
2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP

06-21-2021

KATHY BOW, ROBERT PAPP, AND SUSAIN WEISINGER, Plaintiffs, v. CEBRIDGE TELECOM CA, LLC D/B/A SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS; ALTICE USA, INC.; CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; CEBRIDGE ACQUISITION, L.P.; CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

MAYER BROWN LLP ARCHIS A. PARASHARAMI (SBN 321661) HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP KYLE P. SEELBACH (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants


MAYER BROWN LLP ARCHIS A. PARASHARAMI (SBN 321661) HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP KYLE P. SEELBACH (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RULE 26 DEADLINES [L.R. 144; FED. R. CIV. P. 6]

Troy L. Nunley United Stat es District Judge

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES, 1. The parties' deadline to file their Rule 26(f) report shall be extended to July 23, 2021;

2. The parties' deadline to exchange Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures shall be extended to July 23, 2021

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bow v. Cebridge Telecom Ca, LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 21, 2021
2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Bow v. Cebridge Telecom Ca, LLC

Case Details

Full title:KATHY BOW, ROBERT PAPP, AND SUSAIN WEISINGER, Plaintiffs, v. CEBRIDGE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 21, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2021)