From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bovanizer v. Babcock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

November, 1914.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the complaint not being subdivided into separately numbered paragraphs, the denials of the answer are to be deemed to apply to all the material allegations of the complaint, and even if considered as denials of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief, are sufficient to raise an issue as to the allegations of transfer to and ownership by plaintiff. (See Rochkind v. Perlman, 123 App. Div. 808; Curran v. Arp, 141 id. 659.) All concurred.


Summaries of

Bovanizer v. Babcock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Bovanizer v. Babcock

Case Details

Full title:Paul Bovanizer, Respondent, v. Rufus A. Babcock, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1914

Citations

165 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)