From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boutin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Sep 24, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-0322 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-0322.

September 24, 2009


ORDER


The parties filed an unopposed motion for entry of agreed protective order. (Docket Entry No. 15). The parties have shown good cause for the entry of a protective order in this case, which will involve discovery into employment records that contain sensitive and private information and other records that contain proprietary and confidential information about the defendant's business and policies. However, the proposed protective order the parties submitted did not include a provision permitting the requesting party to challenge confidentiality designations and did not adequately address the need for a separate showing and order to seal documents filed with the court (as opposed to exchanged in discovery). The proposed order has been changed in those respects. The agreed order is otherwise adopted.


Summaries of

Boutin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Sep 24, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-0322 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Boutin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY BOUTIN, Plaintiff, v. EXXON MOBIL CORP., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Sep 24, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-0322 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2009)