From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bourgoin v. Unicredit Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Sep 6, 2011
Civil No. 2:11-cv-120-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 2:11-cv-120-DBH

09-06-2011

MARIE BARBARA BOURGOIN, Plaintiff v. UNICREDIT GROUP, et al., Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 12, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, her Recommended Decision and Order Addressing Recusal. The time within which to file objections expired on August 29, 2011, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore O RDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED. The defendants Allstate Insurance Company and Encompass Insurance and their law firms are relieved from filing further responses in this litigation unless specifically ordered to do so by this Court.

Further, I place Marie Barbara Bourgoin on NOTICE that filing restrictions "may be in the offing." Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993). This represents the "cautionary order" of which Cok speaks. Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated.

SO ORDERED.

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bourgoin v. Unicredit Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Sep 6, 2011
Civil No. 2:11-cv-120-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Bourgoin v. Unicredit Grp.

Case Details

Full title:MARIE BARBARA BOURGOIN, Plaintiff v. UNICREDIT GROUP, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 2:11-cv-120-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 6, 2011)