From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boure v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 18, 2009
290 S.W.3d 195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED92166.

August 18, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Margaret M. Neill, Judge.

Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Christopher Koster, John W. Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.



ORDER


Movant, Stephan Boure, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by coercing him to plead guilty.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Boure v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 18, 2009
290 S.W.3d 195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Boure v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stephan BOURE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Aug 18, 2009

Citations

290 S.W.3d 195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)