From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bourbakis v. Boron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2005
24 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-04469.

December 5, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Jacek Boron and Complete Cab Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated April 30, 2004, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Before: Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident through the affirmed medical reports submitted in support of their motion ( see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Manceri v. Bowe, 19 AD3d 462; Aronov v. Leybovich, 3 AD3d 511). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider whether the plaintiff's papers in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( id.).


Summaries of

Bourbakis v. Boron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2005
24 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Bourbakis v. Boron

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BOURBAKIS, Respondent, v. JACEK BORON et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
804 N.Y.S.2d 685