From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bouman v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 28, 2004
863 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-4807.

Opinion filed January 28, 2004.

Appeal from the State of Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission; L.T. Case No. 02-7890.

Thomas Bouman, Boca Raton, pro se.

John M. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.


We affirm the final action of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying appellant's claim for unemployment benefits as a result of his resignation from his position with his employer. Although appellant claims that he was forced to resign due to his employer's violence against him, the only violent incident directed at appellant occurred six weeks prior to appellant's resignation. Moreover, appellant's resignation letter indicated that he had obtained a better job with better benefits. At the hearing on unemployment benefits, he testified that he did not have a job at the time he wrote the letter, but he acquired a new position a few days later. Given the evidence presented by appellant himself, there was competent substantial evidence to support the referee's determination that appellant's reason for resignation from employment was without good cause nor attributable to the employer. The administrative ruling must be sustained if based upon any acceptable view of the evidence. See Fink v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 665 So.2d 373, 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bouman v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 28, 2004
863 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Bouman v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS BOUMAN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 28, 2004

Citations

863 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)