From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boulden v. Froseth

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Mar 28, 2008
07-cv-602-bbc (W.D. Wis. Mar. 28, 2008)

Opinion

07-cv-602-bbc.

March 28, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has been filing with the court copies of his routine discovery demands to defendants' attorney. See dkts. 20, 21 and 25. He should stop this. The February 26, 2008 preliminary pretrial conference order states that "the court does not want the parties to file their discovery material with the court, except to support some other matter in this lawsuit, such as a summary judgment motion." If there is a discovery dispute that requires court action, then plaintiff may file a motion to compel or to protect. Otherwise, he should not clutter the court's docket with unnecessary submissions.


Summaries of

Boulden v. Froseth

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Mar 28, 2008
07-cv-602-bbc (W.D. Wis. Mar. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Boulden v. Froseth

Case Details

Full title:RANDOLPH WALLACE BOULDEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL FROSETH and ANTHONY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Mar 28, 2008

Citations

07-cv-602-bbc (W.D. Wis. Mar. 28, 2008)