From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bouie v. Gastelo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 5, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-2575 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-2575 JAM DB P

05-05-2020

DIRK JAONG BOUIE, Jr., Petitioner, v. JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 10, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2020, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. DATED: May 5, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bouie v. Gastelo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 5, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-2575 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Bouie v. Gastelo

Case Details

Full title:DIRK JAONG BOUIE, Jr., Petitioner, v. JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 5, 2020

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-2575 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2020)