From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bough v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 2, 2009
No. CIV S-08-1627 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1627 GGH P.

June 2, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a request for reconsideration of this court's order filed April 28, 2009, denying his request for a certificate of appealability.

Local Rule 78-230(k) requires that a party seeking reconsideration must brief the "new or different facts or circumstances [which] were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion." After reviewing the record, the court finds that petitioner has not demonstrated that the April 28, 2009, order was erroneous.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, this court's order of April 28, 2009, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Bough v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 2, 2009
No. CIV S-08-1627 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Bough v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:ERIC D. BOUGH, Petitioner, v. M.C. KRAMER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 2, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1627 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2009)