Boudette v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Brightstar LLC v. Jordan

    552 P.3d 1133 (Colo. App. 2024)

    If a procedural rule is clear and unambiguous, then we apply it as written. Boudette v. State, 2018 COA 109, ¶ 20, 425 P.3d 1228. ¶ 35 The FAA requires "[n]otice" of a motion to vacate an arbitration award to be "served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is filed or delivered."

  2. Schnelle v. Cantafio

    548 P.3d 1171 (Colo. App. 2024)   Cited 2 times

    It is a question of law concerning the effect of rulings under C.R.C.P. 56 and 50. See Boudette v. State, 2018 COA 109, ¶ 20, 425 P.3d 1228 (interpretation of procedural rules presents a question of law). And whether the question may be dispositive of the case is one factor we may consider in deciding whether the question is controlling.

  3. In re L.R.B.

    487 P.3d 1058 (Colo. App. 2019)   Cited 5 times

    ¶ 32 Whether a party has standing is a question of law that we review de novo. Boudette v. State , 2018 COA 109, ¶ 15, 425 P.3d 1228. ¶ 33 "Standing is a threshold issue that must be satisfied in order to decide a case on the merits."