From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bouchard v. Rozario

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 25, 1986
506 A.2d 1159 (Me. 1986)

Opinion

Argued November 7, 1985.

Decided March 25, 1986.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Penobscot County.

Logan, Kurr Hamilton, Harold C. Hamilton (orally), Bangor, for plaintiff.

James D. Poliquin (orally), Portland, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., NICHOLS, ROBERTS, VIOLETTE, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ., and WERNICK, A.R.J.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff Patrick Bouchard appeals from the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court (Penobscot County) in favor of defendant Dr. Rodney Rozario. The trial court certified its action as a final judgment pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 54(b), stating "Interest of justice — no good reason for delay." At that time, however, a statute of limitations defense similar to that raised by defendant Rozario was being asserted by two of his codefendants and had not been adjudicated. We must dismiss plaintiff's appeal for the lack of a final judgment, because the trial court failed to include a "brief reasoned statement supporting [its] decision to enter a Rule 54(b) certification" as required by Cole v. Peterson Realty, Inc., 432 A.2d 752, 757 (Me. 1981).

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

Bouchard v. Rozario

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 25, 1986
506 A.2d 1159 (Me. 1986)
Case details for

Bouchard v. Rozario

Case Details

Full title:Patrick BOUCHARD v. Rodney A. ROZARIO

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Mar 25, 1986

Citations

506 A.2d 1159 (Me. 1986)