From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 9, 2017
151 A.D.3d 1778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-09-2017

In the Matter of Weldon INGRAM, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department Of Corrections And Community Supervision, Respondent.

Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Landers of Counsel), for respondent.


Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for petitioner.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Landers of Counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking review of determinations, following tier II disciplinary hearings, that he violated inmate rules 104.13 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][5][iv] [creating a disturbance] ), 106.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][7][i] [refusing direct order] ), 113.13 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][14][iii] [intoxication] ), and 181.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][26][i] [noncompliance with hearing disposition] ). To the extent that petitioner contends that the determination finding that he violated inmate rules 106.10 and 181.10 is not supported by substantial evidence, we note that his plea of guilty to those violations precludes our review of his contention (see Matter of Edwards v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1328, 1329, 930 N.Y.S.2d 358 ). We further conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the determination with respect to inmate rules 104.13 and 113.13 (see generally People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139, 495 N.Y.S.2d 332, 485 N.E.2d 997 ). Any denials by petitioner with respect to those two violations raised, at most, an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see generally Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the determinations are unanimously confirmed without costs and the amended petition is dismissed.

CARNI, J.P., CURRAN, TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 9, 2017
151 A.D.3d 1778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Ingram v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Weldon INGRAM, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 9, 2017

Citations

151 A.D.3d 1778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
53 N.Y.S.3d 872

Citing Cases

Washington v. Annucci

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination, following…

Washington v. Annucci

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination, following…