From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bouchard v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 29, 2012
468 F. App'x 999 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-3125

05-29-2012

JAMES L. BOUCHARD, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

BEVERLY B. BATES, Bates & Baum, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for petitioner. CALVIN M. MORROW, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were JAMES M. EISENMANN, General Counsel, and KEISHA DAWN BELL, Deputy General Counsel.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in Case No. AT1221100506-W-1.

JUDGMENT

BEVERLY B. BATES, Bates & Baum, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for petitioner.

CALVIN M. MORROW, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were JAMES M. EISENMANN, General Counsel, and KEISHA DAWN BELL, Deputy General Counsel.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

___________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Bouchard v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 29, 2012
468 F. App'x 999 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Bouchard v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. BOUCHARD, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 29, 2012

Citations

468 F. App'x 999 (Fed. Cir. 2012)