From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bottrell v. Office of Personnel Management

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Feb 22, 1989
867 F.2d 1421 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Opinion

Appeal No. 88-3214.

February 22, 1989.

John C. Morrison, Kiefer Morrison, Alexandria, Va., argued, for petitioner.

Robert A. Reutershan, Asst. Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent. With him on the brief, were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and David M. Cohen, Director. Also on the brief, were James M. Strock, Gen. Counsel, Thomas F. Moyer, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Jill Gerstenfield, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, of counsel.

Appealed from Merit Systems Protection Board.

Before FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge, BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge.


The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) denied Marlyn Bottrell's request for survivor benefits as the former spouse of a deceased federal employee. OPM ruled that her divorce decree did not "expressly provide for" a survivor annuity on its face as required by 5 U.S.C. § 8341(h)(1) (Supp. IV 1986). It also concluded that Bottrell was not a designated beneficiary under 5 U.S.C. § 8342(c) (1982), and therefore not entitled to a lump-sum benefit.

The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 36 M.S.P.R. 338 (1988), sustaining OPM's denial of survivor benefits is affirmed on the basis of the Board's opinion which we adopt.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bottrell v. Office of Personnel Management

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Feb 22, 1989
867 F.2d 1421 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Bottrell v. Office of Personnel Management

Case Details

Full title:MARLYN J. BOTTRELL, PETITIONER, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 22, 1989

Citations

867 F.2d 1421 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Fox v. Office of Personnel Management

Accordingly, when the terms of an agreement are ambiguous, the Board has denied an annuity to the surviving…